Exact page URL
Identify the specific xMaat page rather than only naming the operator.
Accuracy and accountability
Corrections and Content-Update Policy
How readers and operators can report errors to xMaat, what evidence is needed and how material corrections are assessed and implemented.
Clear principlesLocal contextOpen accountability
Purpose and scope
A clear route for fixing material errors
Betting offers, cashier limits, product availability, operator identities and regulatory conditions can change. xMaat welcomes specific correction requests that identify the affected page and provide reliable evidence.
The objective is not to preserve old wording. It is to publish the most accurate and appropriately qualified version supported by the available evidence.
Core principles
What a useful correction report contains
Use these points as the practical standard for interpreting this policy.
Affected statement
Quote or clearly describe the field, table row, link or conclusion in question.
Reason it is wrong
Explain whether the problem is factual, outdated, misleading, broken or assigned to the wrong country.
Supporting evidence
Provide current official terms, interface evidence, regulatory material or another reliable source.
Evidence date
State when the source was accessed or the screenshot captured.
Requested review
Explain whether the claim should be corrected, qualified, removed or investigated.
Important detail
How xMaat evaluates a request
- Does the evidence address the exact published claim?
- Does it apply to the same country, currency and product?
- Is the evidence current and sufficiently authoritative?
- Could the change reflect one account state rather than general availability?
- Would a qualification be more accurate than complete removal?
- Do metadata, tables, FAQs and schema also require correction?
In practice
Possible outcomes
Correction
The factual error is amended across every affected visible and structured-data location.
Qualification
The wording is narrowed because the evidence supports only a limited or country-specific conclusion.
Update
Previously accurate information is replaced after a material change.
No change
The supplied evidence does not contradict the published claim or is insufficiently relevant.
Further review
The issue remains unresolved while stronger evidence is sought.
Related xMaat pages
Continue with the relevant policy or resource
The standards pages work together and should be interpreted consistently.